I thought I read the ESPN.com article wrong this morning. I then re-read the article. I then read it a 3rd time and realized I was correctly reading the article. Pete Rose (click on his name 
for link to article) of all people is passing judgement on the players who might be involved in The Mitchell Report. Is that not like the devil saying, "It's hot down here"? Why is it that every time something in baseball happens, he has to opine on it? Frankly I could care less what "Charlie Hustle" has to say about anything. I was all for his Hall of Fame eligibility until 2004 when he admitted he did bet on baseball. I am all for taking a man at his word until otherwise proven worthless. Which I hope is not the case with Roger Clemens, but I was burned by ole' Pete.
for link to article) of all people is passing judgement on the players who might be involved in The Mitchell Report. Is that not like the devil saying, "It's hot down here"? Why is it that every time something in baseball happens, he has to opine on it? Frankly I could care less what "Charlie Hustle" has to say about anything. I was all for his Hall of Fame eligibility until 2004 when he admitted he did bet on baseball. I am all for taking a man at his word until otherwise proven worthless. Which I hope is not the case with Roger Clemens, but I was burned by ole' Pete.
No comments:
Post a Comment